Print | Send on Yahoo! | PDF version | Feed RSS | Filed Under: MISCELLANEOUS

Windows® 7 facing thorny real-life security issues

Date: 01/14/2009
Author: Razvan Livintz

Are the “right ingredients” – simplicity, reliability and speed – right enough to cope with the current e-threats landscape?

The long-acclaimed "best version of Windows ever", as Steve Ballmer enthusiastically called it last week at the International Consumer Electronic Show in Las Vegas, reached the 7000 build and its public beta, with both supporters and critics.

Professional testers, IT&C geeks, as well as snoopy average Joe users almost caused a genuine Denial-of-Service when rushed last weekend to frantically download the latest OS version of the Redmond-based corporation and literally blocked Microsoft's servers.

Eight years after the introduction of XP®, currently the most extensively used operating system in the world, and two years after the "painful" Vista® experience, the very first clicks and browses foretell a possible success story for Microsoft®. Users report having positive experiences, with a significantly reduced boot-up time, more effective memory usage, as well as an improved Web browsing experience. More important, it looks like Windows 7 is totally capable to run on most netbooks, since it is more robust and suitable for the Intel Atom-based machines, even compared to its XP ancestor (keep the fingers crossed not to be another Vista capable story).

Still, there is at least one chapter where Windows 7 did not perform well - security. Less than a week after the beta release, Microsoft issued a first update (please do read "patch") that concerns a possible MP3 files corruption, but did not patch a Denial-of-Service vulnerability that could also affect the Windows 7 Beta users.

Meanwhile, different security solutions experience difficulties in dealing with the beta OS due to new API components. Users of some McAfee and Symantec products were not able to deploy and run their defensive applications on a freshly installed copy of Windows 7 for compatibility reasons (although NortonTM is listed as an official Windows 7 security software provider).

Whether Windows 7 will pass the security tests or not is too early to tell after a simple glance at the Beta. Probably the end of 2009 (or the beginning of 2010?) and the advent of the official release will tell us more. Until then, with the hope that Microsoft security response policy will improve and Windows 7 will keep its agile shape, we can only welcome it and hope for the best in terms of systems security - "Long is the way, and hard, that out of hell leads up to light."

Share our story:
DiggStumbleUpondel.icio.usYahooMyWebFurlGoogle

user comments
Nicely put, Razvan! An objective and insightful review about the security solutions for W7. Congrats!
@ Two-Bit, Jan-15-2009 03:35


Than you, Two-Bit. Thank you for reading us :)

Best,
Razvan Livintz
Interesting information. As I also noticed, Windows 7 has some lacks. My main concerne is now how, after I upgraded my Windows Vista SP1 to Windows 7, it has disabled my antivirus (Bitdefender) firewall. Humm!!!
@ Benjamin
The firewall got disabled due to the new features in Windows 7 (new API components). Remember that you are currently using a BETA operating system therefore until a final version is released you might encounter a few unexpected issues with different applications.
Future BitDefender products will be fully compatible with Windows 7 (the final version of the operating system).
Comment on this:
Name:
Email:
Your email address will not be published!

Please enter the code from the image below.
The code is not case sensitive
Verification Image
Reload image
 
 
Calendar
March 2010
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    
« Feb March Apr »
Tag Claud
messages windows canadian review conficker infected security virus bitdefender twitter rogue exploit malware pharmacy file worm antivirus microsoft word software omelette online computer data downadup files message spam trojan system