Print | Send on Yahoo! | PDF version | Feed RSS | Filed Under: MISCELLANEOUS

Microsoft Offers Ransom for E-threat Authors

Date: 02/13/2009
Author: Razvan Stoica

The WWW - is it World Wide Web or Wild Wild West?


Network World's Ellen Messmer reports that Microsoft is offering a quarter-million dollar reward for turning in the person or persons responsible for the creation of the Downadup aka Conficker worm .

Moreover, Microsoft is coordinating with ICANN and other organisations responsible for the DNS infrastructure to register and block the domain names which could be used by the worm, in the hopes that by doing that its creators will not be able to turn the Downadup worms (which are now quite harmless) into logic bombs, ransomware or spam relays or whatever else they feel like. Downadup has an algorithmically-generated list of candidate command & control servers; eachinstance of the worm checks some of these periodically, providing an infection count and asking for updates.

The technique is not without precedent, but the response is. While blocking domains may go a long way towards preventing a "night of the living dead" scenario, the other aspect (that of the ransom) raises an interesting opportunity.

Say you were a member of a criminal organisation. You commission (and receive, from a black-hat hacker or group) a huge botnet. Some other wiseguys on the 'net post a reward for turning in the authors.

Do you now:

a. exploit it for your nefarious purposes

b. turn in the virus writer(s) OR

c. do both of the above?

I suppose it all depends on how useful you deem the virus writers to be to you in the future and what you estimate the cost of replacing them will be. In other words, the reward system probably works, if the rewards are high enough, although it probably doesn't work by punishing the criminal masterminds, but rather by providing a strong disincentive for prospective enablers (i.e. wannabe virus writers).


Share our story:
DiggStumbleUpondel.icio.usYahooMyWebFurlGoogle

user comments
So Conficker was black-hat? Not a harmless demostration about how to exploit long-known bugs?
The title should read "bounty" not "ransom."
@jan:
Do you know something we don't?
Comment on this:
Name:
Email:
Your email address will not be published!

Please enter the code from the image below.
The code is not case sensitive
Verification Image
Reload image
 
 
Calendar
March 2010
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    
« Feb March Apr »
Tag Claud
spam word message file twitter microsoft messages security bitdefender computer virus data exploit malware omelette worm infected conficker trojan pharmacy software windows rogue downadup review online canadian system antivirus files